| 
|
This piece is part of a larger section called 'Short takes'. To see all of that section, click on these lines.
Thank you, thank you!
When I picked up the latest issue of the University Concourse and spotted an article regarding courtship, I had to sigh. I fully expected a typically Steubenville affirmation of this oddest of rituals. I was, however, most pleasantly surprised, and not a little impressed, to find that someone had actually taken a Catholic (not to mention common sense) approach to dealing with the topic. As an engaged person on campus, I find your treatment of the love that leads to marriage refreshing. Thank God that someone has finally focused on how beautiful a dating relationship has the potential to be!
My fiance and I both are very grateful that you chose to address the fallacies of the courtship theory--an idea that is, we believe, inherently unCatholic. One can only hope that on a campus so justly famous for its vibrant Catholicism this richer understanding of love will finally come to supplant its Protestant cousin.
Catherine Egan: FUS junior, English/drama major
Related Articles:
A Catholic critique of a current notion of courtship, Kathleen van Schaijik (V,7)
Reforming our thinking about courtship and sexuality, William Craig (V,8)
Thank you, thank you!, Catherine Egan (V,8)
The influence of Puritanism, Jeff Zare (V,8)
[back to top]
© The University Concourse, May 4, 2000
|