| 
|

| 
|
New face, same spirit |
Just in case anyone was tempted to think that after four years of energetic debates, probing discussions and unstinting efforts to press this University to still greater heights of excellence, the Concourse might be getting old and weary, we've decided to ring in our fifth year of publication with a brand new look.
The creative genius of our tireless Design Editor, Justine (Franzonello, '93) Schmiesing, has come up with a design that captures at one and the same time our seriousness about truth and our aim of keeping our conversations fresh, lively and--where possible--full of good-cheer.
With this edition we also launch a new regular feature (likewise the fruit of Justine's genius) called the Bulletin Board, which can be seen on p. 12 of this issue. There our readers will find such things as Concourse and Student Forum announcements, suggestions for new topics, and brief reader comments.
Meanwhile, our commitment to our original principles is as staunch and spirited and poised-for-action as ever. We declare anew that an open forum for the raising of concerns and the airing of disagreements and the debating of ideas at FUS, however much discomfort it may incidentally generate, is beyond legitimate; it is beyond worth-having; it is beyond beneficial; it is quite plainly and simply indispensable. It is a necessary help in preserving and promoting every other great good at Franciscan University. Further, we renounce and trample merrily upon any suggestion--let it come from everso high-up or everso low-down on the University's hierarchy of membership--that to engage in public criticism of public things is to offend the laws of charity. We insist upon the very opposite! To neglect to cry out when we see a neevil worming its way into the fabric of a costly garment for fear of offending delicate ears, is to prove but sorry stewards of our charge. In other words-- Love does what it takes, shrieks or no shrieks.
We would also like to use this occasion to remind our readers that the Concourse is an excellent place for students and alumni to become practiced in the almost-extinct and highly-to-be-praised art of courteous and intelligent conversation. (I say students and alumni not to be too flagrant in suggesting that some of our faculty and staff could be deficient in this area.) FUS is very good at devotion and enthusiasm; we preach admirably well; we crackle with orthodoxy. But--let's be honest--we are somewhat wanting in subtlety and grace when it comes to defending and promulgating the truth we love so sincerely and religiously. Deficient, perhaps, too, in listening to and receiving the truth others have to offer us.
There is no better way to remedy these defects than by practicing discourse here, in the pages of the University Concourse, where we are among friends who share our devotion and our good intentions, if not our opinions.
Most importantly, to enter into serious debate about important things is to help one another realize more of Truth; and to realize more of Truth, as Ben Brown shows so persuasively in his article on p.7, is to realize more of God, to grow closer to Him, and to become more like Him.
It is for this that the Concourse exists.
We will be expanding on these things on Thursday, September 23rd at 7:30pm in the Fireside Lounge.. I hope many of you will be able to come! I don't get to campus often and I would like to see your faces.
Kathleen van Schaijik
Related Articles:
Orthodox not paradox, Kathleen van Schaijik (I,3)
How does a university evangelize?, Kathleen van Schaijik (I,4)
Getting personal, the editors (I,5)
Apologia pro disputatione musica, the editors (I,6)
Concluding remarks, the editors (I,7)
Can charismatics and traditionalists peacefully coexist?, Kathleen van Schaijik (II,1)
The challenge of the Concourse: discussion without (much) contention, Kathleen van Schaijik (II,2)
When old ideas are breaking up, Kathleen van Schaijik (II,3)
Silence betokens ... What?, Kathleen van Schaijik (III,3)
The freedom of stricture, Kathleen van Schaijik (III,4)
Faith and Reason, Kathleen van Schaijik (IV,2)
Strangers to the world, Kathleen van Schaijik (IV,6)
New face, same spirit, Kathleen van Schaijik (V,1)
Bringing the masses from starvation to full strength, Kathleen van Schaijik (V,4)
Branching out through Christus Magister, Kathleen van Schaijik (V,6)
The evil of exorcising judgement, Kathleen van Schaijik (VI,1)
Jump Start, Kathleen van Schaijik (VII,1)
By the same author:
NFP, by itself, does not compromise the marriage vocation, (I,1)
What is a 'real' Catholic education?, (I,2)
Orthodox not paradox, (I,3)
NFP and connaturality, (I,4)
How does a university evangelize?, (I,4)
Thomism and intellectual freedom, (I,5)
Keeping our worship in step with 'what the Spirit is saying' to FUS, (I,7)
Can charismatics and traditionalists peacefully coexist?, (II,1)
The horror of polygamy and the persistence of chauvinistic theories in Catholic academia, (II,1)
The challenge of the Concourse: discussion without (much) contention, (II,2)
When old ideas are breaking up, (II,3)
Why the polygamy problem is not as passe as it appears: Kathleen van Schaijik responds to her critics, (II,4)
Why 'charismatic spirituality' belongs at the heart of our communal life, (II,9)
What is the University Concourse?, (III,1)
How not to help households, (III,1)
Silence betokens ... What?, (III,3)
The freedom of stricture, (III,4)
What were households meant to be?, (III,5)
Different degrees of authority, (III,5)
Last words (for now), (III,6)
A suggestion regarding Extraordinary Ministers, (III,6)
Catholic teaching on capital punishment, (III,6)
A final thought on the household issue, (III,6)
What is our mission, really?, (III,6)
What if Shakspere wasn't Shakespeare?, (III,6)
Clinton's sorry legacy, (III,6)
Evolution, (III,6)
Intimidated? Please don't be., (III,6)
A gift for the graduates of '98, (III,6)
A point of policy, (III,6)
A point of principle, (III,6)
A word of thanks, (III,6)
Love Never Leaves, (IV,1)
Faith and Reason, (IV,2)
A different perspective on the modesty question, (IV,5)
Strangers to the world, (IV,6)
Happy & sad, (IV,7)
Oxford gaining on Shakspere, (IV,7)
Of private and collegiate morality, (IV,7)
Newman, education and context, (IV,7)
Witnesses to Faith in the face of death, (IV,7)
Viva the class of '99!, (IV,7)
A prize winning physicist out of his depth, (IV,7)
A positive psychology, (IV,7)
How to become a leader, (IV,7)
Campus politics, (IV,7)
Thanksgiving, (IV,7)
New face, same spirit, (V,1)
The 'Stratford man' and the Shakespearean canon: no match at all, (V,3)
Bringing the masses from starvation to full strength, (V,4)
Branching out through Christus Magister, (V,6)
Kathleen van Schaijik replies to John Doman on Shakespeare, (V,6)
A Catholic critique of a current notion of courtship, (V,7)
Fr. Michael's achievement, (V,8)
Charity may be severe, (V,8)
On the other side of the same coin, (V,8)
Shakespeare debate update, (V,8)
Beware of economic Puritanism, (V,8)
What the education debate is and isn't about, (V,8)
The Weimar Republicans, (V,8)
Drawing out an analogy, (V,8)
Dear Class of 2000, (V,8)
How to support the Concourse by buying books, (V,8)
Thanksgiving, (V,8)
The evil of exorcising judgement, (VI,1)
Jump Start, (VII,1)
It's not the Vatican, it's the laity, (VII,1)
Abusing NFP, (VII,1)
[back to top]
© The University Concourse, September 22, 1999
|