the University Concourse
Volume IV, Issue 7
May 4, 1999
Table of Contents

Send this article to a friend


This piece is part of a larger section called 'Editor's Postscript'.
To see all of that section, click on these lines.

How to become a leader

The March 1999 issue of Fides--a promotional newsletter sent to friends and benefactors of FUS--featured an article titled "Transforming Students into Servant Leaders." It was about the campus Institute for Catholic Leadership, which "provides training programs and seminars for Franciscan University students to develop their individual and group leadership skills."

I confess I have less than no faith in such programs. Not, of course, that there is nothing worthwhile at all to be learned through them--no doubt they include lots of good and useful tips. But I'm afraid what good they contain will be outdone by the bad of giving students the silly and self-defeating illusion that they are being "transformed into leaders" by attending them. Real leadership is not so painlessly gained.

The content of the seminars that comes through in the article does nothing to allay my doubts. For instance, the article provides a list of "essential elements of servant-leadership:"

1. beginning by changing oneself
2. being a good listener
3. being empathetic and accepting of others
4. having a positive effect (healing influence) on people and situations
5. building community through cooperation

(Note that this list might just as well have been titled "characteristics of a very nice person." It tells us nothing whatsoever about the essence of leadership.)

I propose an alternative program for would-be leaders:

1. Forget about leadership talks and time-management seminars.
2. Dedicate yourself to prayer, and to discerning the Divine Will for your life.
3. Throw yourself into your studies.
4. Make painful personal sacrifices for what you believe is true and right.
5. Write articles for the Concourse challenging the campus status quo.

I'm sure as anything this program will do a better job of transforming students into the sort of people who can wield an influence and inspire a following than any number of "Leadership Development Seminars."


Related Articles:
  • How to become a leader, Kathleen van Schaijik (IV,7)
• The value of leadership development seminars, David Schmiesing (V,1)


By the same author:
• NFP, by itself, does not compromise the marriage vocation, (I,1)
• What is a 'real' Catholic education?, (I,2)
• Orthodox not paradox, (I,3)
• NFP and connaturality, (I,4)
• How does a university evangelize?, (I,4)
• Thomism and intellectual freedom, (I,5)
• Keeping our worship in step with 'what the Spirit is saying' to FUS, (I,7)
• Can charismatics and traditionalists peacefully coexist?, (II,1)
• The horror of polygamy and the persistence of chauvinistic theories in Catholic academia, (II,1)
• The challenge of the Concourse: discussion without (much) contention, (II,2)
• When old ideas are breaking up, (II,3)
• Why the polygamy problem is not as passe as it appears: Kathleen van Schaijik responds to her critics, (II,4)
• Why 'charismatic spirituality' belongs at the heart of our communal life, (II,9)
• What is the University Concourse?, (III,1)
• How not to help households, (III,1)
• Silence betokens ... What?, (III,3)
• The freedom of stricture, (III,4)
• What were households meant to be?, (III,5)
• Different degrees of authority, (III,5)
• Last words (for now), (III,6)
• A suggestion regarding Extraordinary Ministers, (III,6)
• Catholic teaching on capital punishment, (III,6)
• A final thought on the household issue, (III,6)
• What is our mission, really?, (III,6)
• What if Shakspere wasn't Shakespeare?, (III,6)
• Clinton's sorry legacy, (III,6)
• Evolution, (III,6)
• Intimidated? Please don't be., (III,6)
• A gift for the graduates of '98, (III,6)
• A point of policy, (III,6)
• A point of principle, (III,6)
• A word of thanks, (III,6)
• Love Never Leaves, (IV,1)
• Faith and Reason, (IV,2)
• A different perspective on the modesty question, (IV,5)
• Strangers to the world, (IV,6)
• Happy & sad, (IV,7)
• Oxford gaining on Shakspere, (IV,7)
• Of private and collegiate morality, (IV,7)
• Newman, education and context, (IV,7)
• Witnesses to Faith in the face of death, (IV,7)
• Viva the class of '99!, (IV,7)
• A prize winning physicist out of his depth, (IV,7)
• A positive psychology, (IV,7)
  • How to become a leader, (IV,7)
• Campus politics, (IV,7)
• Thanksgiving, (IV,7)
• New face, same spirit, (V,1)
• The 'Stratford man' and the Shakespearean canon: no match at all, (V,3)
• Bringing the masses from starvation to full strength, (V,4)
• Branching out through Christus Magister, (V,6)
• Kathleen van Schaijik replies to John Doman on Shakespeare, (V,6)
• A Catholic critique of a current notion of courtship, (V,7)
• Fr. Michael's achievement, (V,8)
• Charity may be severe, (V,8)
• On the other side of the same coin, (V,8)
• Shakespeare debate update, (V,8)
• Beware of economic Puritanism, (V,8)
• What the education debate is and isn't about, (V,8)
• The Weimar Republicans, (V,8)
• Drawing out an analogy, (V,8)
• Dear Class of 2000, (V,8)
• How to support the Concourse by buying books, (V,8)
• Thanksgiving, (V,8)
• The evil of exorcising judgement, (VI,1)
• Jump Start, (VII,1)
• It's not the Vatican, it's the laity, (VII,1)
• Abusing NFP, (VII,1)


[back to top]

© The University Concourse, May 4, 1999