| 
|
This piece is part of a larger section called 'Questions, comments and continuing conversations'. To see all of that section, click on these lines.
Enjoying the concourse
I left Honors 301 on break the other day and our class sat in our usual position in the Egan hallway, but there was none of the usual banter, none of the teasing twelve-minute stress-relief. There was a new Concourse out, and our collective nose was buried in the articles. Despite its infrequent schedule, your journal is an important part of life on campus, and I truly enjoy reading it each time it arrives.
By the way, I think Joe Sobran is wrong about Shakespeare because he (JS) is a closet parricide. With a father that ran out on him, Sobran can't take authority at face value. Because of that, he is always "biting the hand that feeds him." Thus his stance on the Jewish question as well. Thanks again for the Concourse.
Michael Magree
Junior, classics/philosophy major
The editor replies:
My thanks for the very encouraging remarks. It's always nice to hear that the Concourse is appreciated.
Readers should note that the frequency of our publishing schedule depends almost entirely on the number of articles submitted to us. If you'd like us to appear more often, please keep them coming!
I don't know anything about Sobran's childhood, or his alleged psychological dysfunctions. I formed my opinion based on the overwhelming evidence he laid out in his book.(1) (It's interesting to observe that critics of Sobran's theory seem never to address the substance of his argument.) But if we're going to bring up the psychology of the case, I might just as well point out that if some people are disposed by nature or circumstance to be anti-establishment, many more are disposed to be conformists. These will disregard any amount of evidence rather than admit the possibility that truth could be on the side of a rogue amateur who refuses to toe the orthodox scholars' line.
Footnotes: 1
See the Post Script section of Vol. III, issue6. Sobran's book, published by The Free Press in 1997, is titled Alias Shakespeare. It argues that the real bard is Edward de Vere, seventeenth Earl of Oxford.
Related Articles:
Commendations (1), Charles Fischer (I,2)
Commendations (2), Regis Martin (I,2)
Commendations (3), Christopher P. Wright (I,3)
Commendations and comments (1), Christine Boyle (I,4)
Commendations (6), Elizabeth Brown (I,5)
Commendations (5), Becky Faraj (I,5)
Commendations (4), Thomas Howard (I,5)
Commendations and comments (2), Albert Faraj (I,7)
Commendations and comments (3), Nina Kay (I,7)
Subscription renewal, Daniel Ellis (II,1)
A thank you note, Regis Martin (II,1)
Thanks for discomfort, Judith Bratten (II,3)
Renewed commendations, Christopher P. Wright (II,9)
Commendations (7), Ruth Ann Stearns (III,2)
Thank you, Jim and Meg Beckman (III,5)
Pluralism and orthodoxy, Joanna K. M. Bratten (IV,1)
Compliments from a reader, Joe Griesemer (IV,1)
More compliments, Robert Thomas (IV,1)
Enjoying the concourse, Michael Magree (IV,3)
[back to top]
© The University Concourse, December 8, 1998
|