| 
|
This piece is part of a larger section called 'Editor's Postscript'. To see all of that section, click on these lines.
Catholic teaching on capital punishment
Noelle Hiester has a knack for nabbing the timely topics. Last year she raised the Extraordinary Ministers issue in the Concourse just a few months before the Vatican came out with the new document on the subject. In March she wrote about how Karla Faye Tucker's execution had forced her to reevaluate her pro-capital punishment thinking. In the April issue of First Things, Father Neuhaus writes, in response to an inquiry about the Church's official position on the death penalty: "What we may be witnessing here is what Cardinal Newman called the development of doctrine...A conscientious Catholic who supports the use of the death penalty in anything but the most extraordinary circumstances must give due consideration to the fact that the bishops conference, and most likely his own bishop, strongly disagree. He must give most particular consideration to the fact that the Pope disagrees, and may be declaring as doctrine that 'extraordinary circumstances' is defined as circumstances in which there is no other way to protect society. Moreover, such a Catholic must be prepared for the possibility that the Church is moving toward a definitive moral prohibition of capital punishment, in which whole-hearted assent to such teaching is required."
I don't know about you all, but from now on, I'm taking Noelle Hiester's opinions very seriously.
Related Articles:
Should Catholics oppose the death penalty?, Noelle Hiester (III,5)
Catholic teaching on capital punishment, Kathleen van Schaijik (III,6)
By the same author:
NFP, by itself, does not compromise the marriage vocation, (I,1)
What is a 'real' Catholic education?, (I,2)
Orthodox not paradox, (I,3)
NFP and connaturality, (I,4)
How does a university evangelize?, (I,4)
Thomism and intellectual freedom, (I,5)
Keeping our worship in step with 'what the Spirit is saying' to FUS, (I,7)
Can charismatics and traditionalists peacefully coexist?, (II,1)
The horror of polygamy and the persistence of chauvinistic theories in Catholic academia, (II,1)
The challenge of the Concourse: discussion without (much) contention, (II,2)
When old ideas are breaking up, (II,3)
Why the polygamy problem is not as passe as it appears: Kathleen van Schaijik responds to her critics, (II,4)
Why 'charismatic spirituality' belongs at the heart of our communal life, (II,9)
What is the University Concourse?, (III,1)
How not to help households, (III,1)
Silence betokens ... What?, (III,3)
The freedom of stricture, (III,4)
What were households meant to be?, (III,5)
Different degrees of authority, (III,5)
Last words (for now), (III,6)
A suggestion regarding Extraordinary Ministers, (III,6)
Catholic teaching on capital punishment, (III,6)
A final thought on the household issue, (III,6)
What is our mission, really?, (III,6)
What if Shakspere wasn't Shakespeare?, (III,6)
Clinton's sorry legacy, (III,6)
Evolution, (III,6)
Intimidated? Please don't be., (III,6)
A gift for the graduates of '98, (III,6)
A point of policy, (III,6)
A point of principle, (III,6)
A word of thanks, (III,6)
Love Never Leaves, (IV,1)
Faith and Reason, (IV,2)
A different perspective on the modesty question, (IV,5)
Strangers to the world, (IV,6)
Happy & sad, (IV,7)
Oxford gaining on Shakspere, (IV,7)
Of private and collegiate morality, (IV,7)
Newman, education and context, (IV,7)
Witnesses to Faith in the face of death, (IV,7)
Viva the class of '99!, (IV,7)
A prize winning physicist out of his depth, (IV,7)
A positive psychology, (IV,7)
How to become a leader, (IV,7)
Campus politics, (IV,7)
Thanksgiving, (IV,7)
New face, same spirit, (V,1)
The 'Stratford man' and the Shakespearean canon: no match at all, (V,3)
Bringing the masses from starvation to full strength, (V,4)
Branching out through Christus Magister, (V,6)
Kathleen van Schaijik replies to John Doman on Shakespeare, (V,6)
A Catholic critique of a current notion of courtship, (V,7)
Fr. Michael's achievement, (V,8)
Charity may be severe, (V,8)
On the other side of the same coin, (V,8)
Shakespeare debate update, (V,8)
Beware of economic Puritanism, (V,8)
What the education debate is and isn't about, (V,8)
The Weimar Republicans, (V,8)
Drawing out an analogy, (V,8)
Dear Class of 2000, (V,8)
How to support the Concourse by buying books, (V,8)
Thanksgiving, (V,8)
The evil of exorcising judgement, (VI,1)
Jump Start, (VII,1)
It's not the Vatican, it's the laity, (VII,1)
Abusing NFP, (VII,1)
[back to top]
© The University Concourse, April 30, 1998
|