| 
|
This piece is part of a larger section called 'Questions, comments and continuing conversations'. To see all of that section, click on these lines.
NFP and connaturality
Speaking of connaturality, (see "St. Thomas and Catholic connaturality" in this issue) Dr. Waldstein has made an important point apropos of the NFP discussion. Last week he wrote me the following: "When one makes the distinction between actions that are the fruit of careful and prayerful moral reasoning and actions that are mechanical, one should perhaps emphasize a tertium quid: namely, actions that flow from a connaturality with what is good: St. Elizabeth of Hungary gave alms to beggars out of an intense connaturality with Christ and His mercy. Such actions seem similar to those that proceed from careful and prayerful reflection in being truly morally good actions, and yet also similar to mechanical ones in being immediate and spontaneous, without requiring reasoning."
He zeros right in on a weakness I had sensed (without being able to articulate it to myself) in my original article. My criticism of "providentialism" left the impression that married couples best live out their vocation when they consciously deliberate over the number of children they should have. Dr. Waldstein reminds me that many live by a more spontaneous conformity with the divine plan for family life--without conscious "discernment" about family size, but nonetheless with a free and responsible openness to and trust in God's perfect providence. It seems to me that NFP can be part of this connatural union with goodness--i.e. when it is practiced by couples who, without delving minutely into the the doctrinal question or worrying about whether their reasons are grave enough, spontaneously recognize its blessing for their family and receive it with gratitude.
My thanks for a insight which enriches the discussion and at the same time gently corrects a mis-placed emphasis in my position.
Meanwhile, his letter also raised the intriguing question of the role of communities in developing connaturality, which I hope will be taken up with more completeness by him and others in future issues of the Concourse. I am wondering particularly about the relation between the charismatic renewal--with its strong emphasis on discerning God's will--and the break-down of "normal" Catholic culture and parish life.
In some ways it seems to me that the conscious awareness of and cooperation with God's plan for our individual lives, which is so characteristic of those in the renewal, represents a definite advance in the lived-faith of Catholics. (This is particularly evident among the numerous youth in the renewal, who not only consider themselves Catholics, but who deeply and ardently desire to lay down their lives for God.) But at the same time, I think it can be seen as a sort of "unusual" gift of grace given (perhaps only for a time) to help the faithful survive the emergency situation of the anti-Christian culture of the day, and all the time intended to lead us to the re-establishment of an unselfconscious, connatural communal life of faith.
Would love to read others' thoughts on this.
Kathleen van Schaijik, Class of '88
Related Articles:
NFP, by itself, does not compromise the marriage vocation, Kathleen van Schaijik (I,1)
NFP (1), Carole Brown (I,2)
NFP (2), Susan C. Fischer (I,2)
NFP (3), Carol Puccio (I,3)
NFP and connaturality, Kathleen van Schaijik (I,4)
NFP and breastfeeding, Daniel Ellis (I,6)
Abusing NFP, Kathleen van Schaijik (VII,1)
Beware laxism, John F. Crosby (VIII,1)
The logic of love, Michael Houser (VIII,1)
NFP and peace of mind, TG (VIII,1)
Marriage and the use of Natural Family Planning, Thomas Storck (VIII,1)
By the same author:
NFP, by itself, does not compromise the marriage vocation, (I,1)
What is a 'real' Catholic education?, (I,2)
Orthodox not paradox, (I,3)
NFP and connaturality, (I,4)
How does a university evangelize?, (I,4)
Thomism and intellectual freedom, (I,5)
Keeping our worship in step with 'what the Spirit is saying' to FUS, (I,7)
Can charismatics and traditionalists peacefully coexist?, (II,1)
The horror of polygamy and the persistence of chauvinistic theories in Catholic academia, (II,1)
The challenge of the Concourse: discussion without (much) contention, (II,2)
When old ideas are breaking up, (II,3)
Why the polygamy problem is not as passe as it appears: Kathleen van Schaijik responds to her critics, (II,4)
Why 'charismatic spirituality' belongs at the heart of our communal life, (II,9)
What is the University Concourse?, (III,1)
How not to help households, (III,1)
Silence betokens ... What?, (III,3)
The freedom of stricture, (III,4)
What were households meant to be?, (III,5)
Different degrees of authority, (III,5)
Last words (for now), (III,6)
A suggestion regarding Extraordinary Ministers, (III,6)
Catholic teaching on capital punishment, (III,6)
A final thought on the household issue, (III,6)
What is our mission, really?, (III,6)
What if Shakspere wasn't Shakespeare?, (III,6)
Clinton's sorry legacy, (III,6)
Evolution, (III,6)
Intimidated? Please don't be., (III,6)
A gift for the graduates of '98, (III,6)
A point of policy, (III,6)
A point of principle, (III,6)
A word of thanks, (III,6)
Love Never Leaves, (IV,1)
Faith and Reason, (IV,2)
A different perspective on the modesty question, (IV,5)
Strangers to the world, (IV,6)
Happy & sad, (IV,7)
Oxford gaining on Shakspere, (IV,7)
Of private and collegiate morality, (IV,7)
Newman, education and context, (IV,7)
Witnesses to Faith in the face of death, (IV,7)
Viva the class of '99!, (IV,7)
A prize winning physicist out of his depth, (IV,7)
A positive psychology, (IV,7)
How to become a leader, (IV,7)
Campus politics, (IV,7)
Thanksgiving, (IV,7)
New face, same spirit, (V,1)
The 'Stratford man' and the Shakespearean canon: no match at all, (V,3)
Bringing the masses from starvation to full strength, (V,4)
Branching out through Christus Magister, (V,6)
Kathleen van Schaijik replies to John Doman on Shakespeare, (V,6)
A Catholic critique of a current notion of courtship, (V,7)
Fr. Michael's achievement, (V,8)
Charity may be severe, (V,8)
On the other side of the same coin, (V,8)
Shakespeare debate update, (V,8)
Beware of economic Puritanism, (V,8)
What the education debate is and isn't about, (V,8)
The Weimar Republicans, (V,8)
Drawing out an analogy, (V,8)
Dear Class of 2000, (V,8)
How to support the Concourse by buying books, (V,8)
Thanksgiving, (V,8)
The evil of exorcising judgement, (VI,1)
Jump Start, (VII,1)
It's not the Vatican, it's the laity, (VII,1)
Abusing NFP, (VII,1)
[back to top]
© The University Concourse, March 26, 1996
|