| 
|
This piece is part of a larger section called 'Questions, comments and continuing conversations'.
To see all of that section, click on these lines.
NFP (1)
I just received a copy of the University Concourse in my box at work and read Kathleen van Schaijik's outstanding article: "NFP, by it itself, does not compromise the married vocation." She addressed an attitude I have been aware of for some time, although I am single and thus not involved with NFP.
I think NFP is a God-sent method for many families, and while I too admire those who throw caution to the wind and abandon themselves to Divine Providence, I also believe that life is a cooperative process between God and us, and that this is an area where we do indeed "work out our salvation in fear and trembling."
Carole Brown, MA Theology program
Related Articles:
• NFP, by itself, does not compromise the marriage vocation, Kathleen van Schaijik (I,1)
• NFP (1), Carole Brown (I,2)
• NFP (2), Susan C. Fischer (I,2)
• NFP (3), Carol Puccio (I,3)
• NFP and connaturality, Kathleen van Schaijik (I,4)
• NFP and breastfeeding, Daniel Ellis (I,6)
• Abusing NFP, Kathleen van Schaijik (VII,1)
• Beware laxism, John F. Crosby (VIII,1)
• The logic of love, Michael Houser (VIII,1)
• NFP and peace of mind, TG (VIII,1)
• Marriage and the use of Natural Family Planning, Thomas Storck (VIII,1)
By the same author:
• NFP (1), (I,2)
• The charismatic and traditional dimensions of the life of faith: A match made in heaven, (V,3)
[back to top]
© The University Concourse, February 27, 1996
|
